YAY OR NAY WEDNESDAY

So last week I asked you what you thought of the proposed cover for Hester Browne's third Little Lady book, What the Lady Wants, and we were unanimous in our nays. Since then I've heard from Hester's agent, publisher and Hester herself that that's probably not going to be the cover after all. Sadly not because of our nays (the power!), but ... well, just because. Even more sadly, the book's release has been postponed from January 2008 to the end of May. But I have no doubt that it will be worth waiting for.

On to this week's question. I recently read Shari Low's The Motherhood Walk of Fame and, on the back of the book, discovered some little categorising icons. The choices are Terror, Thrills, Drama, Love, Sex,  and Humour, each with their own little illustration (an Oscar for Drama, a pair of pants for Sex, etc.) and then there's a pie chart to let you know what to expect from the book you're holding in your hot little hand.

For example, The Motherhood Walk of Fame is approximately 60% Humour, 20% Love and 20% Drama.

What do you think of this kind of information on a book? Is it simply a helpful indication of what you might expect or a patronising insult to the reader's intelligence? In other words...

Book category icons: Yay or Nay and Why?

[Don't forget it's Yay or Nay day at Hippyshopper, Bridalwave, Dollymix, Corrie Blog, Catwalk Queen, Kiss and Makeup, The Bag Lady, Shoewawa and Shiny Shiny, too!]

YAY OR NAY WEDNESDAY - Comments

  • Sarah Painter

    Nay! The cover, back blurb and first page or two should be more than enough to tell me A. Whether I want to read it and B. What kind of book it is. It strikes me as lazy and insulting (to the author as well as the reader). And I agree with Shanna - if I&#39m promised 80% of something or other, I&#39m more likely to look for it/be disappointed by the mere 65% contained therein...

  • A guide like that might be kind of nice at times, as I&#39ve often been burned by books that weren&#39t quite what I was looking for. During the heyday of chicklit I was always finding books with cute cartoon covers and that whimsical type style on the cover, with the cover blurb making it sound like a hilarious romp, only to find that the book itself was some dark thing about family angst. Now that chick lit is almost a publishing dirty word in the US, all the books have more arty or photographic covers, so it&#39s impossible to tell what you&#39re getting, if it&#39s a fun book or a slit your wrists book. Then again, if the cover and cover blurb don&#39t give an accurate impression of the book, can we count on them to be accurate in their rating graph? If sexy books are what&#39s popular, will all books be labeled for high sexiness?



    There&#39s also the risk that the rating might set expectations up for disappointment. If you tell me a book is going to be funny and I don&#39t laugh, I might be disappointed, while I might have enjoyed the book on its own merits if I bought it just for the story rather than expecting it to be 80 percent hilarious.



    So I guess the final vote is yay if it&#39s done right, but because we are dealing with the real world and, I fear, publishers are quite often clueless in how books are packaged or what readers are looking for, I would have to come down on the Nay side.

  • Hmmm. This is actually a tough one for me. Generally, I make my reading choices based on 3 things: the cover, the back cover blurb, and the first 2 pages. The icons seem like they would only work on chick lit/humorous books. In those cases, I think they&#39d be adding to the overall cheekiness (in a good way!) of the book. But for other genres, I think it would be quite odd. So, I guess my vote is more Nay than Yay.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Came straight to this page? Visit Trashionista for loads more stories!