« GUEST BLOG: Martina Reilly | Main | HELEN'S HEROINES: Rachel Samstat »
Domestic violence? No, "hit lit"
I started to read the Daily Mail's review of Marian Keyes' This Charming Man with trepidation. It was in the Daily Mail after all - not a paper that's known for its enlightened views on women.
To begin with, I was pleasantly surprised:
"Chick-lit, like the better class of real chicks, is no longer battery-farmed. It has lost its bland and uniform Wet-Woman-In-Bedsit-Waiting-For-Mr-Right aspects and gone free-range over all sorts of territory — some of it dark and violent."
It's good to know that someone has noticed that chick lit has moved on. And yet...
"This Charming Man ... is about women who've received nasty knocks as well, although this time from the man they love.
Mr Wrong. Domestic violence. Hit lit, I suppose you could call it."
Wow. "Hit lit." That's not at all flippant.
(Just in case you think I'm over-reacting, two women are killed every week by their partner or ex-partner, and almost one in two women has experienced some form of domestic violence. There are almost 13 million incidents of domestic violence annually in the UK, and it is estimated that an incident of domestic abuse occurs every six to 20 seconds.)
But it was the Daily Mail. I couldn't be too shocked. Until I noticed the byline. The review was written by chick lit author Wendy Holden. How disappointing.
Came straight to this page? Visit www.trashionista.com for more female fiction news, reviews and interviews.
Posted by Shiny Media on May 12, 2008 in Opinion | Permalink
Comments
That really is disappointing. Would she have classed Anna Quindlen (Black & Blue) or Roddy Doyle (The Woman Who Walked into Doors) as Hit-Lit as well?
No, of course not. How disrespectful.
Posted by: Ms Mac | May 12, 2008 3:34:30 PM
Oh dear - having just written 1800 on domestc abuse and its effects on women and children (and it is women and children, over 90 oer cent of the time) I'm acutely aware of its prevalence. I guess the Mail were just looking for a cheap laugh, at women's expense. Again. Ugh.
Posted by: diane shipley | May 13, 2008 1:22:04 AM
erm, sorry that was so badly worded! I meant 1800 words... this computer hates me, I swear...
Posted by: diane shipley | May 13, 2008 1:27:54 AM
I'm not trying to be sensationalist here, but that really is disgusting. I don't think things like that should be printed and to be honest I feel so strongly I'll never buy a Wendy Holden book.
Posted by: Amy | May 13, 2008 7:54:48 AM
It is rather insulting isn't it? To trivialise something so serious?
I can see what she was trying to do - be all funny/ witty/ chick-litty authory but she has misfired here, badly. It's just cringeworthy, really.
Posted by: Claire | May 13, 2008 10:56:51 AM
Empora | Buy womens clothes online




