stats count

« BOOK NEWS: Loose Girl | Main | Exciting Lisa Jewell news »

What did you read as a teen?

I read a bit of controversy about young adult fiction a couple of weeks ago, but didn't really think anything of it and didn't feel strongly enough about it to write about it here. Um, but now I do. So I'll tell you what and why.

In a review of a young adult book in the Guardian, the author Frank Cottrell Boyce wrote the following:

There's been a lot of fury among authors recently about the proposal to "age-band" children's books, but in a way they're too late. The real disaster has already happened. It's called "young adult" fiction. It used to be the case that you moved on from children's fiction to adult fiction, from The Owl Service, maybe, to Catcher in the Rye. There were, of course, some adult authors who were more fashionable with teenage readers than others - Salinger, Vonnegut, Maya Angelou. But these were chosen by teenagers themselves from the vast world of books. Some time ago, someone saw that trend and turned it into a demographic. Fortunes were made but something crucial was lost. We have already ghettoised teenagers' tastes in music, in clothes and - God forgive us - in food. Can't we at least let them share our reading? Is there anything more depressing than the sight of a "young adult" bookshelf in the corner of the shop. It's the literary equivalent of the "kids' menu" - something that says "please don't bother the grown-ups". If To Kill a Mockingbird were published today, that's where it would be placed, among the chicken nuggets.

I read the above quote on the blog, A Chair, A Fireplace & A Tea Cosy along with the following response:

[Frank Cottrell Boyce] recalls teenagers going from children's lit to adult lit, and worries that today's teens are being kept from that adult lit. He also seems to be saying that good YA books are really adult books with a bad label.

As a lifelong reader, my choices have always been varied. At ten I was reading adult fiction; but I was also reading children's lit. It was never an either/or; and there was never a "don't read this," either at home, in a bookstore, or in a library. So yes, I did read adult lit as a teen; but I see today's teens doing likewise, reading a bit from here, a bit from there.

As for what YA lit has become.... I look at what we have now and get angry and jealous that I didn't have the reading choices as a teen that teens have today. I recall looking at adult shelves to try to find something that was teen friendly - so some of my adult book reading was not a choice, but a default. I would have loved to have the books that are available today; and I hope that these books don't go away.

When I first read this, I agreed with the above and didn't agree with Frank Cottrell Boyce at all. And then I started (belatedly) reading the excellent Fine Lines column on Jezebel. Reminded of books like Paul Zindel's The Pigman and To All My Fans, With Love, From Sylvie by Ellen Conford, I could suddenly picture myself wandering the library, desperately trying to find a book that appealed to me and, more importantly, a book that seemed relevant to me.

I can't remember reading any British teen fiction at all. It was all Judy Blume, Paul Zindel, Lois Duncan, Paula Danziger. What I would have given for a Louise Rennison or Sarra Manning. Of course, once I'd read all the above authors, I discovered the Sweet Dreams books, which no doubt led pretty much directly to my love of chick lit...

What about you? What did you read as a teen? And what are your thoughts on YA now?

[via The Boyfriend List]

Came straight to this page? Visit www.trashionista.com for more female fiction news, reviews and interviews.

Posted by Shiny Media on June 30, 2008 in Opinion, Young Adult | Permalink

Comments

When I was a teen (many, many years ago!), I did read adult lit, classic literature, and plenty of teen oriented fiction. I am currently reading a fabulous YA novel called Rumors by Anna Godberson. I'd read (devoured) her first book The Luxe a few months ago and couldn't wait to get my hands on the sequel. I think the only thing that makes this book YA is that the characters are mostly in their late teens. Otherwise, it is pretty dang grown up!

Posted by: Lucie Simone | Jun 30, 2008 7:13:49 PM

Ooh, I've got The Luxe here somewhere - will read it next!

Yes, the boundaries are blurred between teen and adult fiction now, I find. But I think that's probably because teens tend to be a lot more adult than they were "in my day" ;)

Posted by: Keris | Jun 30, 2008 8:05:43 PM

I confess, I read young adult fiction and enjoy it! Loved the Gossip Girl Series and Anna Godberson's "The Luxe." Then there is Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson and Sweethearts (this one was really good) by Sara Zarr. I think you would be surprised at how many adults are picking up this genre.

Posted by: Charlene | Jun 30, 2008 11:02:02 PM

I don't remember there being much fiction aimed just for teens when I was in that age bracket. I read mostly Stephen King and anything else that would make me too afraid to turn the lights out, and Barbara Cartland romances. However, as I'm now the parent of two teens (egads! I can't be that old!) I appreciate the YA genre. Their lives are much more complicated than mine was and they grow up so much faster - it's nice that they have reading choices geared to the issues they face.

Posted by: Tami | Jun 30, 2008 11:23:46 PM

My feathers were so ruffled by the thoughts of this person I had to add a response of my own to my blog. Please feel free to click and comment if you wish. Thanks to whoever found this!

Posted by: Tarah | Jul 1, 2008 2:43:10 AM

I'm a teen and I read both adult and YA books. I just go for what ever sounds good.

Posted by: Hillary | Jul 1, 2008 3:36:38 AM

Thanks for all the comments!

Tami reminded me of another good point - since I couldn't find anything relevant to me as a teen, I too read Mills & Boon and Jilly Cooper books. Rereading them now, I realise how totally unsuitable they were. I hate the thought of me, all innocent aged 13 or 14, reading about men forcing themselves on women who then admitted they "deserved" it, etc. (See my review of Jilly Cooper's appalling Octavia http://www.trashionista.com/2008/03/book-review-oct.html)

Yes, some YA fiction may be more shocking than we might like, but at least the messages are generally more positive.

Posted by: Keris | Jul 1, 2008 8:06:50 AM

I can sympathise with what Frank Cottrell Boyce is trying to say, even if I don't entirely agree with him. He's trying to warn against ghettoising teen fiction, restricting young adults from reading outside pre-set boundaries. That was never my personal experience, and I don't believe it will be for the majority of teens today.

Like the blog author you quoted, I'm also envious of the YA choices that are available these days. Our local library's YA section has novels for a variety of reading levels, from those you'd find in the section aimed at, say, 8-year olds in Waterstones, to adult novels that the librarian has presumably thought might be of interest to younger readers (Sylvia Plath's 'The Bell Jar', 'A Gathering Light' by Jennifer Connolly etc).

I agree that YA novels when I was younger were largely American in focus. When we started hitting puberty we read a lot of those awful V.C. Andrews novels, full of rape and incest. The choices these days are definitely better than those!

Posted by: treehavn | Jul 1, 2008 11:09:09 AM

God, yes, treehavn - I remember the Virginia Andrews books being passed around school. Horrible, horrible books! I might have to dedicate a separate post to them...

Posted by: Keris | Jul 1, 2008 12:27:35 PM

Oh god, I read Virginia Andrews too, with a smattering of Mills and Boon...what a dangerous mix! Loved Adrian Mole when it came out, but I was way past my teens by then!

Posted by: Karen | Jul 1, 2008 5:11:17 PM

I don't think the concept of YA/teen fiction is new. It's just the shelving that's changed. Back in the Dark Ages, the books we'd now call YA were shelved either in the children's section or in the adult section, mostly based not so much on content as on what else the author wrote. So Judy Blume's teen books were shelved in children's because at that time she mostly wrote for a younger audience, while a lot of the science fiction and fantasy books that had teen protagonists were shelved in adult fiction because the authors were considered "adult" authors (and I've noticed that some of these books are being reissued as YA).

Unfortunately, that limited readership because a lot of self-respecting teens wouldn't be caught dead browsing the children's section, while parents sometimes frowned on "adult" books, especially for younger teens. As a result, "teen" books were kind of a forgotten stepchild of the industry.

Now that there is a YA section, I think the market has exploded because having the section demonstrated that there was an audience and a demand for these books. Teens didn't have to be classified as "children" anymore, and they have an easier time finding books about characters in their age bracket.

I was a huge Paul Zindel fan as a teen, and there really wasn't much else like it out there, which was very frustrating for me.

Posted by: Shanna Swendson | Jul 1, 2008 5:13:52 PM

"I don't think the concept of YA/teen fiction is new." Maybe not in the US, Shanna, but I certainly think it is (well, relatively new) in the UK. Like I said, there wasn't anything when I was a teen ... unless my library didn't stock it that is.

Posted by: Keris | Jul 1, 2008 6:27:54 PM

My library stocked lots of British YA fiction when I was growing up. I read it all, several times over, and dreamed of writing it some day.

I disagree with FCB. There's nothing wrong with separate YA sections. Adults shouldn't be scared to look there, that's all. YA books won't bite them. ;) And if adults don't read YA, I truly believe they're missing out. :)

Posted by: Luisa | Jul 3, 2008 9:38:09 PM

First, speaking of the VC Andrews books, which my sister and I devoured, by daughter, who is now 17, also began devouring them around the 13 or 14 I think, though she lost interest in them pretty quickly afterwards.

I don't remember reading YA novels as a teen, I'm pretty sure I went from kids books to adult books. I remember reading The Exorcist when I was twelve. Maybe there weren't a lot of YA books back then? I honestly don't remember, it would have been in the late 70's. Anyway, I have recently been reading quite a lot of YA novels, especially Newberry Award winners, and have discovered that I missed out on a lot of good stories!

Posted by: Robin | Jul 3, 2008 9:44:00 PM

I found this guy's comments a little pretentious and in "the good old days" vein. Our local University has been running a three day English Festival with workshops and games aimed at kids in 7-12 grade and featuring YA books for 30 years now. The YA genre is hardly a new ghettoization of teen taste in lit. That said, I love many YA books and authors (Scott Westerfeld and Naomi Shahib Nye come immediately to mind).

Just was when I was a teen, there is good stuff to be found in both the adult and teen categories. The "chicken nuggets" can also be ordered from both menus.

Posted by: lucy | Jul 9, 2008 3:09:10 PM

I'm surprised no one has mentioned that staple of teen reading, Nancy Drew. I burned through many of those in my early teen years (also, the V.C. Andrews and Paul Zindel that others have mentioned). The writing in today's YA literature is so much better (more chicken Cordon Bleu than chicken nuggets). I belong to a book club of adults who read and discuss YA books. Check out what we're reading on our blog: http://yalitlovers.wordpress.com/

Posted by: Christine | Jul 16, 2008 3:25:19 PM

Good books are good books and must be read. I wonder, Keris, if you've read Coal Black Horse. Not intended for teens, perhaps, not marketed for teens, but a teen is the protagonist in this enormously beautiful and searing Civil War story. It's a universal book, as the best of books are. It's a book about a boy and a horse. Why doesn't it appear on teen shelves? Why can't it appear on both adult shelves, and YA?

Posted by: beth kephart | Jul 22, 2008 1:34:27 AM

Post a comment